Students who are unable to write their own work pose problems for the universities – in different ways.
Clean scientific work
It is one of the main goals of undergraduate studies to acquire the ability to work scientifically. This includes documenting the sources used, identifying citations as such and distinguishing their own thoughts from those of other authors.
This still seems to be a big hurdle for many students. For there are always reported cases in which plagiarized unrestrained: Instead of the scientific sources carefully go through a quick Google search is carried out, instead of testing the suitability of ideas, whole Text parts copied and pasted into your own work. The assessment of being drowned out in the crowd anyway and thus not being caught proves to be a dangerous fallacy.
“He does not check that out” is a thought that has inspired many to act recklessly. But what if? If the lecturer who makes the impression that he can not turn on a computer, suddenly turns out to be a knowledgeable connoisseur who checks the suspicious (because too professional sounding) sections of text and track their source within seconds, just to present it to the student and as a basis for to use some, very unpleasant questions?
It is different, however, when students envisage the use of academic ghostwriters; Anyone who commissions a reputable agency – who knows their writers well and benefits from their specialist and methodical competence – will receive a work that also stands up to plagiarism testing.
For academic ghostwriters work strictly according to the scientific guidelines that customers give them. A ghostwriter who plagiarized would be fired immediately from his agency. For this reason, universities fear such student attempts to deceive more than clumsy network plagiarism, which can be easily detected.